Brazil vs Eritrea: Gross savings (current LCU), annual growth rate
Brazil
10.24 % change on previous year
in 2025
Eritrea
10.59 % change on previous year
in 2000
Brazil rank
69th
Eritrea rank
67th
Gross savings (current LCU), annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 10.59 % change on previous year against 10.24 % change on previous year in Brazil, a difference of 0.35 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 69th and Eritrea ranks 67th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.08 % change on previous year | 33.44 % change on previous year | 16.37 % change on previous year | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 21.1 % change on previous year | 10.59 % change on previous year | 10.51 % change on previous year | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), annual growth rate, Brazil or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 10.59 % change on previous year against 10.24 % change on previous year in Brazil as of 2000.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), annual growth rate between Brazil and Eritrea?
- 0.35 % change on previous year, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eritrea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2000.
- How do Brazil and Eritrea rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 69th and Eritrea ranks 67th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Gross savings (current LCU). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.