Mali vs Sierra Leone: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Mali
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 10.8% against 9.8% in Mali, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Mali's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 15th and Sierra Leone ranks 12th of 49 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 10.2% | 2.9% | 7.2% | Mali |
| 1990s | 10.1% | 3.9% | 6.1% | Mali |
| 2000s | 7.9% | 4.5% | 3.4% | Mali |
| 2010s | 9.8% | 8.8% | 0.9% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Mali or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 10.8% against 9.8% in Mali as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Mali and Sierra Leone?
- 1.0%, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sierra Leone?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2011.
- How do Mali and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross public investment?
- Mali ranks 15th and Sierra Leone ranks 12th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.