Liberia vs Mauritius: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Liberia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 6.1% against 5.5% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Liberia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Liberia ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 49 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.0% | 6.6% | 2.6% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 5.2% | 5.8% | 0.6% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Liberia or Mauritius?
- Liberia, at 6.1% against 5.5% in Mauritius as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Liberia and Mauritius?
- 0.6%, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Mauritius?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Liberia and Mauritius rank globally for gross public investment?
- Liberia ranks 35th and Mauritius ranks 38th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.