Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Tanzania
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 8.9% against 8.9% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th and Tanzania ranks 19th of 49 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.2% | 6.0% | 14.3% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 10.9% | 3.6% | 7.2% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Guinea-Bissau or Tanzania?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 8.9% against 8.9% in Tanzania as of 2002.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2002.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania rank globally for gross public investment?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th and Tanzania ranks 19th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.