Chad vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Chad
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Chad currently reports 9.1% against 8.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Chad ranks 17th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 19th of 49 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.4% | 5.5% | 1.9% | Chad |
| 2000s | 9.1% | 5.7% | 3.4% | Chad |
| 2010s | 9.1% | 8.3% | 0.8% | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Chad or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Chad, at 9.1% against 8.9% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.2%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross public investment?
- Chad ranks 17th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 19th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.