Burundi vs Namibia: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Burundi
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 8.6% against 8.2% in Burundi, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Namibia ahead.
Burundi ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 49 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 13.8% | 10.7% | 3.1% | Burundi |
| 1990s | 9.3% | 8.2% | 1.1% | Burundi |
| 2000s | 6.2% | 6.0% | 0.2% | Burundi |
| 2010s | 8.1% | 8.0% | 0.1% | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Burundi or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 8.6% against 8.2% in Burundi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Burundi and Namibia?
- 0.4%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Namibia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Burundi and Namibia rank globally for gross public investment?
- Burundi ranks 24th and Namibia ranks 22nd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.