Burkina Faso vs Malawi: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Burkina Faso
- Malawi
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 7.7% against 6.9% in Malawi, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 26th and Malawi ranks 28th of 49 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 10.4% | 8.1% | 2.3% | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 10.5% | 9.2% | 1.3% | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 9.6% | 8.6% | 1.0% | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 9.2% | 8.2% | 0.9% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Burkina Faso or Malawi?
- Burkina Faso, at 7.7% against 6.9% in Malawi as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 0.8%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Malawi?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2011.
- How do Burkina Faso and Malawi rank globally for gross public investment?
- Burkina Faso ranks 26th and Malawi ranks 28th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.