Angola vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Angola
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 8.9% against 8.7% in Angola, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Angola ranks 21st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th of 49 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.1% | 13.1% | 4.1% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 6.4% | 10.9% | 4.5% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Angola or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 8.9% against 8.7% in Angola as of 2002.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Angola and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.2%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guinea-Bissau?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2002.
- How do Angola and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for gross public investment?
- Angola ranks 21st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.