Algeria vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross public investment
Gross public investment over time
- Algeria
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 27.7% against 24.3% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Algeria ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd of 49 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.4% | 6.9% | 0.5% | Algeria |
| 2000s | 12.7% | 14.6% | 1.9% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 27.7% | 28.7% | 1.1% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross public investment, Algeria or Equatorial Guinea?
- Algeria, at 27.7% against 24.3% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2010.
- What is the difference in gross public investment between Algeria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 3.4%, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Algeria and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gross public investment?
- Algeria ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 2nd of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross public investment (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross public investment (see definition below) as a percentage of GDP (%) . Public sectors’ gross domestic fixed investment (gross fixed capital formation) comprises all additions to the stocks of fixed assets (purchases and own-account capital formation), less any sales of second-hand and scrapped fixed assets measured at constant prices, done by government units and non-financial public enterprises. Most outlays by government on military equipment are excluded. According to 1993 SNA are outlays on weapons and equipment with no alternative civil use treated as intermediate consumption, and part of governments consumption expenditure.