Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Gross national savings, including net current transfers
Malawi
-335.38 million constant LCU
in 2006
Zimbabwe
-1.73 billion constant LCU
in 2005
Malawi rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
39th
Gross national savings, including net current transfers over time
- Malawi
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Malawi currently reports -335.38 million constant LCU against -1.73 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.40 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Malawi ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 40 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national savings, including net current transfers, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
- Malawi, at -335.38 million constant LCU against -1.73 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2006.
- What is the difference in gross national savings, including net current transfers between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 1.40 billion constant LCU, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2005.
- How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross national savings, including net current transfers?
- Malawi ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 39th of 40 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- "World Bank country economists. ", published as Gross national savings, including net current transfers (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national savings, including net current transfers is equal to gross domestic savings plus net income and net current transfers from abroad. Data are in constant local currency.