What is the difference in gross national savings, including net current transfers between Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?

61.02 billion constant LCU, with Chad ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?

12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2006.

Where does this data come from?

"World Bank country economists. ", published as Gross national savings, including net current transfers (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national savings, including net current transfers

Chad

399.05 billion constant LCU

in 2006

Tanzania, United Republic of

338.03 billion constant LCU

in 2006

Chad rank

7th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

8th

Gross national savings, including net current transfers over time

Chad
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Chad currently reports 399.05 billion constant LCU against 338.03 billion constant LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 61.02 billion constant LCU.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 7th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 8th of 40 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
1990s	59.99 billion constant LCU	-6.08 billion constant LCU	66.08 billion constant LCU	Chad
2000s	105.61 billion constant LCU	213.03 billion constant LCU	107.42 billion constant LCU	Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national savings, including net current transfers, Chad or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Chad, at 399.05 billion constant LCU against 338.03 billion constant LCU in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2006.
What is the difference in gross national savings, including net current transfers between Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 61.02 billion constant LCU, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2006.
How do Chad and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross national savings, including net current transfers?: Chad ranks 7th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 8th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?: "World Bank country economists. ", published as Gross national savings, including net current transfers (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national savings, including net current transfers. Statizoid, drawing on "World Bank country economists. ". Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-savings-including-net-current-transfers-constant-lcu/chad/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-savings-including-net-current-transfers-constant-lcu/chad/tanzania/">Chad vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national savings, including net current transfers</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross national savings, including net current transfers (constant LCU)
Unit: constant LCU
Source: "World Bank country economists. "
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 40 places, 929 data points, 1965–2006
Last refreshed: 21 August 2026

Gross national savings, including net current transfers is equal to gross domestic savings plus net income and net current transfers from abroad. Data are in constant local currency.