Malta vs New Caledonia: Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per square

Malta
55.52 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
61.21 million SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
56th
New Caledonia rank
55th

Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per square over time

  • Malta
  • New Caledonia
0204060197019962023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 61.21 million SLC per square kilometre against 55.52 million SLC per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 5.69 million SLC per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 56th and New Caledonia ranks 55th of 194 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1970s 1.58 million SLC per square kilometre 3.21 million SLC per square kilometre 1.64 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 4.52 million SLC per square kilometre 8.03 million SLC per square kilometre 3.51 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 9.28 million SLC per square kilometre 17.68 million SLC per square kilometre 8.4 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 15.72 million SLC per square kilometre 32.54 million SLC per square kilometre 16.81 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 28.92 million SLC per square kilometre 51.17 million SLC per square kilometre 22.26 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 47.44 million SLC per square kilometre 57.67 million SLC per square kilometre 10.23 million SLC per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national income — value standard local currency, per square, Malta or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 61.21 million SLC per square kilometre against 55.52 million SLC per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national income — value standard local currency, per square between Malta and New Caledonia?
5.69 million SLC per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and New Caledonia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Malta and New Caledonia rank globally for gross national income — value standard local currency, per square?
Malta ranks 56th and New Caledonia ranks 55th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs New Caledonia: Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-income-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/malta/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-income-value-standard-local-currency-per-square-kilometre/malta/new-caledonia/">Malta vs New Caledonia: Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per square kilometre
Unit
million SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,587 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.