Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita

Eswatini
0.064 million SLC per person
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0595 million SLC per person
in 2023
Eswatini rank
113th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
114th

Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita over time

  • Eswatini
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.020.040.06197019962023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.064 million SLC per person against 0.0595 million SLC per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0045 million SLC per person.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Eswatini ranks 113th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 114th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0004 million SLC per person 0.0022 million SLC per person 0.0018 million SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0015 million SLC per person 0.0076 million SLC per person 0.006 million SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0056 million SLC per person 0.0187 million SLC per person 0.013 million SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0156 million SLC per person 0.0324 million SLC per person 0.0169 million SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0404 million SLC per person 0.0523 million SLC per person 0.0119 million SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0577 million SLC per person 0.053 million SLC per person 0.0048 million SLC per person Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national income — value standard local currency, per capita, Eswatini or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Eswatini, at 0.064 million SLC per person against 0.0595 million SLC per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national income — value standard local currency, per capita between Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0045 million SLC per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gross national income — value standard local currency, per capita?
Eswatini ranks 113th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 114th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-income-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-income-value-standard-local-currency-per-capita/eswatini/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Eswatini vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency, per capita
Unit
million SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 9,756 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross National Income — Value Standard Local Currency divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.