Eritrea vs Latvia: Gross national expenditure
Gross national expenditure over time
- Eritrea
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 45.00 billion current LCU against 43.63 billion current LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 1.37 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 150th of 185 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.93 billion current LCU | 5.62 billion current LCU | 2.31 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 21.58 billion current LCU | 15.30 billion current LCU | 6.27 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 41.11 billion current LCU | 19.19 billion current LCU | 21.92 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure, Eritrea or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 45.00 billion current LCU against 43.63 billion current LCU in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure between Eritrea and Latvia?
- 1.37 billion current LCU, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Latvia rank globally for gross national expenditure?
- Eritrea ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 150th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure is the sum of household final consumption expenditure, general government final consumption expenditure, and gross capital formation. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.