Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure
Gross national expenditure over time
- Djibouti
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 867.28 billion current LCU against 701.13 billion current LCU in Djibouti, a difference of 166.15 billion current LCU.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 441.42 billion current LCU | 31.72 million current LCU | 441.39 billion current LCU | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 549.87 billion current LCU | 189.91 billion current LCU | 359.97 billion current LCU | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure, Djibouti or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 867.28 billion current LCU against 701.13 billion current LCU in Djibouti as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure between Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
- 166.15 billion current LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Djibouti and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross national expenditure?
- Djibouti ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 104th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure is the sum of household final consumption expenditure, general government final consumption expenditure, and gross capital formation. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.