Rwanda vs Somalia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Rwanda
831.98 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
756.62 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
15th
Somalia rank
18th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Somalia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 831.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 756.62 million current LCU per square kilometre in Somalia, a difference of 75.36 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 15th and Somalia ranks 18th of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 4 and Somalia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Somalia Difference Ahead
1960s 442,948 current LCU per square kilometre 3,027 current LCU per square kilometre 439,921 current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 2.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 9,544 current LCU per square kilometre 2.22 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 7.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 286,928 current LCU per square kilometre 7.43 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 10.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 6.81 million current LCU per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 304.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 339.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 35.15 million current LCU per square kilometre Somalia
2020s 620.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 634.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.18 million current LCU per square kilometre Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Rwanda or Somalia?
Rwanda, at 831.98 million current LCU per square kilometre against 756.62 million current LCU per square kilometre in Somalia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Rwanda and Somalia?
75.36 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Somalia?
42 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Somalia rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 15th and Somalia ranks 18th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Somalia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/somalia-fed-rep/">Rwanda vs Somalia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.