Panama vs Tunisia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Panama
1.10 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
151st
Tunisia rank
154th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • Tunisia
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1.10 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 74,870 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 151st and Tunisia ranks 154th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 13,803 current LCU per square kilometre 3,501 current LCU per square kilometre 10,302 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
1970s 33,499 current LCU per square kilometre 11,098 current LCU per square kilometre 22,401 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
1980s 82,012 current LCU per square kilometre 44,157 current LCU per square kilometre 37,856 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
1990s 129,817 current LCU per square kilometre 118,912 current LCU per square kilometre 10,905 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2000s 242,403 current LCU per square kilometre 277,235 current LCU per square kilometre 34,832 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 720,895 current LCU per square kilometre 634,749 current LCU per square kilometre 86,146 current LCU per square kilometre Panama
2020s 930,412 current LCU per square kilometre 951,434 current LCU per square kilometre 21,022 current LCU per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Panama or Tunisia?
Panama, at 1.10 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.02 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Panama and Tunisia?
74,870 current LCU per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tunisia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Panama and Tunisia rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 151st and Tunisia ranks 154th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Tunisia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/panama/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/panama/tunisia/">Panama vs Tunisia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.