Pakistan vs Togo: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Pakistan
116.63 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
120.11 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
39th
Togo rank
37th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • Togo
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 120.11 million current LCU per square kilometre against 116.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 3.48 million current LCU per square kilometre.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 39th and Togo ranks 37th of 183 countries.

Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 43,556 current LCU per square kilometre 1.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
1970s 148,850 current LCU per square kilometre 3.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.70 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
1980s 649,543 current LCU per square kilometre 9.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.79 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
1990s 2.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.66 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
2000s 12.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 35.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 23.73 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
2010s 41.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 66.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo
2020s 89.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 103.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 13.48 million current LCU per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Pakistan or Togo?
Togo, at 120.11 million current LCU per square kilometre against 116.63 million current LCU per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Pakistan and Togo?
3.48 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Togo?
61 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Togo rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 39th and Togo ranks 37th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Togo: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/togo/">Pakistan vs Togo: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.