Mexico vs Uruguay: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mexico
17.12 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
16.93 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
83rd
Uruguay rank
84th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Uruguay
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 17.12 million current LCU per square kilometre against 16.93 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 183,300 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 84th of 183 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 143.3 current LCU per square kilometre 0.7946 current LCU per square kilometre 142.5 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 666.62 current LCU per square kilometre 79.63 current LCU per square kilometre 586.99 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 68,201 current LCU per square kilometre 6,540 current LCU per square kilometre 61,661 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 1.39 million current LCU per square kilometre 738,207 current LCU per square kilometre 655,215 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 5.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.64 million current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 10.29 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.92 million current LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 14.78 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 34,675 current LCU per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mexico or Uruguay?
Mexico, at 17.12 million current LCU per square kilometre against 16.93 million current LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mexico and Uruguay?
183,300 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Uruguay rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 83rd and Uruguay ranks 84th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Uruguay: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/uruguay/">Mexico vs Uruguay: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.