Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Mauritius
332.55 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
220.87 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
28th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
31st

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197619992023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 332.55 million current LCU per square kilometre against 220.87 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 111.68 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.5 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 31st of 183 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 35.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 31.33 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 102.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 76.89 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 221.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 109.75 million current LCU per square kilometre 111.41 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 286.49 million current LCU per square kilometre 196.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 90.13 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Mauritius, at 332.55 million current LCU per square kilometre against 220.87 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of?
111.68 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 28th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 31st of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/tanzania/">Mauritius vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.