Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Lesotho
2.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
2.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
136th
Saudi Arabia rank
135th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Lesotho
  • Saudi Arabia
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 2.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.00 million current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 630 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Lesotho ranks 136th and Saudi Arabia ranks 135th of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 2,105 current LCU per square kilometre 6,978 current LCU per square kilometre 4,873 current LCU per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1970s 7,447 current LCU per square kilometre 52,352 current LCU per square kilometre 44,905 current LCU per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 22,872 current LCU per square kilometre 178,826 current LCU per square kilometre 155,954 current LCU per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 729,495 current LCU per square kilometre 624,774 current LCU per square kilometre 104,721 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2010s 1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 180,331 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho
2020s 1.83 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.69 million current LCU per square kilometre 138,550 current LCU per square kilometre Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Lesotho or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 2.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.00 million current LCU per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
630 current LCU per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Saudi Arabia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Saudi Arabia rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Lesotho ranks 136th and Saudi Arabia ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/saudi-arabia/">Lesotho vs Saudi Arabia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.