Germany vs Norway: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Germany
11.60 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
12.32 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
95th
Norway rank
94th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Germany
  • Norway
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M197019962023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 12.32 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.60 million current LCU per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 723,900 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 95th and Norway ranks 94th of 183 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 1.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 474,690 current LCU per square kilometre 1.34 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
1980s 3.21 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.38 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.84 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
1990s 5.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.47 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.74 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
2000s 6.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.83 million current LCU per square kilometre Germany
2010s 8.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 92,495 current LCU per square kilometre Germany
2020s 10.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 639,460 current LCU per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Germany or Norway?
Norway, at 12.32 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.60 million current LCU per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Germany and Norway?
723,900 current LCU per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Germany and Norway rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Germany ranks 95th and Norway ranks 94th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Norway: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/germany/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/germany/norway/">Germany vs Norway: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.