Equatorial Guinea vs French Polynesia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
230.75 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia
249.53 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
30th
French Polynesia rank
29th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • French Polynesia
100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M300.0M200520142023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 249.53 million current LCU per square kilometre against 230.75 million current LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 18.78 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was French Polynesia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th and French Polynesia ranks 29th of 183 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and French Polynesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia Difference Ahead
2000s 131.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 191.87 million current LCU per square kilometre 59.97 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 239.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 196.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 42.91 million current LCU per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 216.62 million current LCU per square kilometre 231.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.46 million current LCU per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 249.53 million current LCU per square kilometre against 230.75 million current LCU per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and French Polynesia?
18.78 million current LCU per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and French Polynesia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and French Polynesia rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 30th and French Polynesia ranks 29th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs French Polynesia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/french-polynesia/">Equatorial Guinea vs French Polynesia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.