Ecuador vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
485,698 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
438,052 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
165th
Mauritania rank
167th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 485,698 current LCU per square kilometre against 438,052 current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 47,646 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 165th and Mauritania ranks 167th of 183 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 8,124 current LCU per square kilometre 577.94 current LCU per square kilometre 7,546 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 25,879 current LCU per square kilometre 3,247 current LCU per square kilometre 22,632 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 58,946 current LCU per square kilometre 8,693 current LCU per square kilometre 50,253 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 78,452 current LCU per square kilometre 26,024 current LCU per square kilometre 52,428 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 152,143 current LCU per square kilometre 86,087 current LCU per square kilometre 66,057 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 380,839 current LCU per square kilometre 233,746 current LCU per square kilometre 147,093 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 439,318 current LCU per square kilometre 379,524 current LCU per square kilometre 59,794 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Mauritania?
Ecuador, at 485,698 current LCU per square kilometre against 438,052 current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Mauritania?
47,646 current LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 165th and Mauritania ranks 167th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.