Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
485,698 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
659,066 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
165th
Latvia rank
162nd

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 659,066 current LCU per square kilometre against 485,698 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 173,368 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 165th and Latvia ranks 162nd of 183 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 93,024 current LCU per square kilometre 90,381 current LCU per square kilometre 2,642 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 152,143 current LCU per square kilometre 245,947 current LCU per square kilometre 93,804 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 380,839 current LCU per square kilometre 384,902 current LCU per square kilometre 4,063 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 439,318 current LCU per square kilometre 566,368 current LCU per square kilometre 127,050 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 659,066 current LCU per square kilometre against 485,698 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Latvia?
173,368 current LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 165th and Latvia ranks 162nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.