Chad vs Guatemala: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chad
7.84 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
8.77 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
108th
Guatemala rank
105th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Guatemala
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 8.77 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.84 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 935,240 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 108th and Guatemala ranks 105th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 5 and Guatemala in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 76,640 current LCU per square kilometre 12,944 current LCU per square kilometre 63,696 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1970s 140,310 current LCU per square kilometre 33,338 current LCU per square kilometre 106,972 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1980s 340,021 current LCU per square kilometre 140,360 current LCU per square kilometre 199,660 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
1990s 625,269 current LCU per square kilometre 819,713 current LCU per square kilometre 194,444 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 2.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 455,086 current LCU per square kilometre Chad
2010s 6.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Chad
2020s 7.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.50 million current LCU per square kilometre 307,900 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chad or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 8.77 million current LCU per square kilometre against 7.84 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chad and Guatemala?
935,240 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Guatemala?
60 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Guatemala rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 108th and Guatemala ranks 105th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Guatemala: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/guatemala/">Chad vs Guatemala: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.