Cape Verde vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cape Verde
73.69 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
77.28 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
50th
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
48th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M199420082023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 77.28 million current LCU per square kilometre against 73.69 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 3.59 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 50th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 48th of 183 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Congo, Democratic Republic of the Difference Ahead
2000s 43.88 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.81 million current LCU per square kilometre 38.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde
2010s 51.53 million current LCU per square kilometre 19.71 million current LCU per square kilometre 31.81 million current LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 65.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 58.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.14 million current LCU per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 77.28 million current LCU per square kilometre against 73.69 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
3.59 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 50th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 48th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/congo-dem-rep/">Cape Verde vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.