Burkina Faso vs Mongolia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
46.92 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
41.32 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
59th
Mongolia rank
62nd

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Mongolia
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 46.92 million current LCU per square kilometre against 41.32 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 5.59 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 59th and Mongolia ranks 62nd of 183 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Mongolia Difference Ahead
1980s 2.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 7,772 current LCU per square kilometre 2.83 million current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 5.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 316,124 current LCU per square kilometre 4.82 million current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 13.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.33 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.79 million current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 27.74 million current LCU per square kilometre 15.68 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.05 million current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 41.61 million current LCU per square kilometre 32.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.68 million current LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Mongolia?
Burkina Faso, at 46.92 million current LCU per square kilometre against 41.32 million current LCU per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Mongolia?
5.59 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Mongolia?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Mongolia rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 59th and Mongolia ranks 62nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Mongolia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/mongolia/">Burkina Faso vs Mongolia: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.