Belarus vs Kiribati: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Belarus
1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
153rd
Kiribati rank
152nd

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Kiribati
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M199220072023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 52,720 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kiribati ahead.

Belarus ranks 153rd and Kiribati ranks 152nd of 183 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 58,633 current LCU per square kilometre 348,002 current LCU per square kilometre 289,368 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 389,310 current LCU per square kilometre 524,480 current LCU per square kilometre 135,170 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 858,023 current LCU per square kilometre 861,478 current LCU per square kilometre 3,455 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Belarus or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 1.09 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.04 million current LCU per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Belarus and Kiribati?
52,720 current LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Kiribati rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 153rd and Kiribati ranks 152nd of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Kiribati: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belarus/kiribati/">Belarus vs Kiribati: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.