Bangladesh vs Chile: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
363.44 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
376.44 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
25th
Chile rank
24th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Chile
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 376.44 million current LCU per square kilometre against 363.44 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 25th and Chile ranks 24th of 183 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 236,282 current LCU per square kilometre 35.4 current LCU per square kilometre 236,246 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 991,998 current LCU per square kilometre 250,230 current LCU per square kilometre 741,768 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 4.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.34 million current LCU per square kilometre 103,905 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 12.93 million current LCU per square kilometre 34.95 million current LCU per square kilometre 22.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 35.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 84.90 million current LCU per square kilometre 49.42 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 136.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 206.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 70.86 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 307.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 332.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 24.79 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Chile?
Chile, at 376.44 million current LCU per square kilometre against 363.44 million current LCU per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Chile?
13.00 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Chile rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 25th and Chile ranks 24th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Chile: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/chile/">Bangladesh vs Chile: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.