Austria vs South Africa: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Austria
5.69 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
5.73 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
113th
South Africa rank
112th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Austria
  • South Africa
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 5.73 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.69 million current LCU per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 39,460 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 113th and South Africa ranks 112th of 183 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 608,010 current LCU per square kilometre 24,126 current LCU per square kilometre 583,884 current LCU per square kilometre Austria
1980s 1.23 million current LCU per square kilometre 121,016 current LCU per square kilometre 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre Austria
1990s 2.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 490,137 current LCU per square kilometre 1.60 million current LCU per square kilometre Austria
2000s 2.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.46 million current LCU per square kilometre Austria
2010s 4.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 439,956 current LCU per square kilometre Austria
2020s 5.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.07 million current LCU per square kilometre 53,590 current LCU per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Austria or South Africa?
South Africa, at 5.73 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.69 million current LCU per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Austria and South Africa?
39,460 current LCU per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and South Africa?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Austria and South Africa rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Austria ranks 113th and South Africa ranks 112th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs South Africa: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/south-africa/">Austria vs South Africa: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.