Australia vs Timor-Leste: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre

Australia
320,424 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Timor-Leste
200,646 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
172nd
Timor-Leste rank
174th

Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Timor-Leste
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 320,424 current LCU per square kilometre against 200,646 current LCU per square kilometre in Timor-Leste, a difference of 119,778 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.6 times Timor-Leste's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 172nd and Timor-Leste ranks 174th of 183 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
2000s 122,475 current LCU per square kilometre 74,465 current LCU per square kilometre 48,010 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2010s 211,977 current LCU per square kilometre 162,306 current LCU per square kilometre 49,672 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2020s 279,927 current LCU per square kilometre 181,667 current LCU per square kilometre 98,260 current LCU per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre, Australia or Timor-Leste?
Australia, at 320,424 current LCU per square kilometre against 200,646 current LCU per square kilometre in Timor-Leste as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre between Australia and Timor-Leste?
119,778 current LCU per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Timor-Leste?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross national expenditure (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 172nd and Timor-Leste ranks 174th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Timor-Leste: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/timor-leste/">Australia vs Timor-Leste: Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 8,010 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.