Iceland vs Nepal: Gross national expenditure
Gross national expenditure over time
- Iceland
- Nepal
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 3.76 trillion constant LCU against 3.38 trillion constant LCU in Nepal, a difference of 377.61 billion constant LCU.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 61st of 168 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.50 trillion constant LCU | 1.38 trillion constant LCU | 1.12 trillion constant LCU | Iceland |
| 2010s | 2.59 trillion constant LCU | 2.27 trillion constant LCU | 316.76 billion constant LCU | Iceland |
| 2020s | 3.44 trillion constant LCU | 3.24 trillion constant LCU | 197.59 billion constant LCU | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure, Iceland or Nepal?
- Iceland, at 3.76 trillion constant LCU against 3.38 trillion constant LCU in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure between Iceland and Nepal?
- 377.61 billion constant LCU, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Nepal rank globally for gross national expenditure?
- Iceland ranks 59th and Nepal ranks 61st of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure is the sum of household final consumption expenditure, general government final consumption expenditure, and gross capital formation. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.