Eritrea vs Latvia: Gross national expenditure
Gross national expenditure over time
- Eritrea
- Latvia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 43.63 billion constant LCU against 33.86 billion constant LCU in Latvia, a difference of 9.77 billion constant LCU.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 135th and Latvia ranks 138th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.81 billion constant LCU | 13.65 billion constant LCU | 2.84 billion constant LCU | Latvia |
| 2000s | 10.31 billion constant LCU | 22.91 billion constant LCU | 12.60 billion constant LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | 26.18 billion constant LCU | 22.75 billion constant LCU | 3.43 billion constant LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure, Eritrea or Latvia?
- Eritrea, at 43.63 billion constant LCU against 33.86 billion constant LCU in Latvia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure between Eritrea and Latvia?
- 9.77 billion constant LCU, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Latvia rank globally for gross national expenditure?
- Eritrea ranks 135th and Latvia ranks 138th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure is the sum of household final consumption expenditure, general government final consumption expenditure, and gross capital formation. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.