Djibouti vs North Macedonia: Gross national expenditure
Gross national expenditure over time
- Djibouti
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 637.46 billion constant LCU against 636.95 billion constant LCU in Djibouti, a difference of 504.00 million constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 89th and North Macedonia ranks 88th of 169 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 427.79 billion constant LCU | 519.36 billion constant LCU | 91.57 billion constant LCU | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 525.27 billion constant LCU | 595.97 billion constant LCU | 70.69 billion constant LCU | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure, Djibouti or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 637.46 billion constant LCU against 636.95 billion constant LCU in Djibouti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure between Djibouti and North Macedonia?
- 504.00 million constant LCU, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and North Macedonia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and North Macedonia rank globally for gross national expenditure?
- Djibouti ranks 89th and North Macedonia ranks 88th of 169 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure is the sum of household final consumption expenditure, general government final consumption expenditure, and gross capital formation. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.