Bulgaria vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure
Gross national expenditure over time
- Bulgaria
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 75.70 billion constant LCU against 72.76 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.94 billion constant LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.05 billion constant LCU | 46.81 billion constant LCU | 3.24 billion constant LCU | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 54.10 billion constant LCU | 67.08 billion constant LCU | 12.98 billion constant LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 69.25 billion constant LCU | 66.67 billion constant LCU | 2.58 billion constant LCU | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross national expenditure, Bulgaria or Zimbabwe?
- Bulgaria, at 75.70 billion constant LCU against 72.76 billion constant LCU in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross national expenditure between Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
- 2.94 billion constant LCU, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Bulgaria and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross national expenditure?
- Bulgaria ranks 124th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross national expenditure is the sum of household final consumption expenditure, general government final consumption expenditure, and gross capital formation. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.