East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

East Timor
172,562 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
185,216 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
158th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • East Timor
  • Zimbabwe
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200020112023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 185,216 constant LCU per square kilometre against 172,562 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 12,654 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was East Timor ahead.

East Timor ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 165 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Timor averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 154,469 constant LCU per square kilometre 121,009 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,460 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 165,971 constant LCU per square kilometre 173,396 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,425 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 165,670 constant LCU per square kilometre 168,402 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,732 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 185,216 constant LCU per square kilometre against 172,562 constant LCU per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
12,654 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
East Timor ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.