Pakistan vs Seychelles: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Pakistan
59.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
65.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
44th
Seychelles rank
42nd

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • Seychelles
20.0M40.0M60.0M198020012023

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 65.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 59.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 5.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 44th and Seychelles ranks 42nd of 165 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Seychelles in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Seychelles Difference Ahead
1980s 14.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre 14.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre 385,100 constant LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 19.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre 25.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre Seychelles
2000s 29.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 28.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 475,610 constant LCU per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 42.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre 47.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre Seychelles
2020s 57.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 61.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Pakistan or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 65.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 59.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Pakistan and Seychelles?
5.48 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Seychelles?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Seychelles rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 44th and Seychelles ranks 42nd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Seychelles: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/seychelles/">Pakistan vs Seychelles: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.