Mexico vs Sweden: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Mexico
13.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
12.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
69th
Sweden rank
71st

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Mexico
  • Sweden
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 13.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 12.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 953,400 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Mexico ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 71st of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 4.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 5.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre 614,943 constant LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 7.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 135,210 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 9.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 948,725 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 11.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre 11.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre 922,282 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 12.44 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 18,125 constant LCU per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Mexico or Sweden?
Mexico, at 13.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 12.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Mexico and Sweden?
953,400 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sweden?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Sweden rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 69th and Sweden ranks 71st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Sweden: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/sweden/">Mexico vs Sweden: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.