Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Greenland
50,260 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
185,216 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
160th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Greenland
  • Zimbabwe
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k200320132023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 185,216 constant LCU per square kilometre against 50,260 constant LCU per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 134,956 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 3.7 times Greenland's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Greenland ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 165 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 42,121 constant LCU per square kilometre 121,009 constant LCU per square kilometre 78,888 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 44,206 constant LCU per square kilometre 173,396 constant LCU per square kilometre 129,190 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 49,659 constant LCU per square kilometre 168,402 constant LCU per square kilometre 118,743 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 185,216 constant LCU per square kilometre against 50,260 constant LCU per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
134,956 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Greenland ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.