Gabon vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Gabon
29.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
35.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Gabon rank
53rd
Iceland rank
52nd

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Gabon
  • Iceland
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 35.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 29.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Gabon, a difference of 5.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Gabon's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Gabon ranks 53rd and Iceland ranks 52nd of 165 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 8.12 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 887,718 constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 10.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 9.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre 16.32 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 11.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre 24.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 21.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 25.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 27.72 million constant LCU per square kilometre 32.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Gabon or Iceland?
Iceland, at 35.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 29.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Gabon as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Gabon and Iceland?
5.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Gabon and Iceland rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Gabon ranks 53rd and Iceland ranks 52nd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gabon vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/gabon/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/gabon/iceland/">Gabon vs Iceland: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.