Ecuador vs Solomon Islands: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
456,241 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
488,246 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
145th
Solomon Islands rank
144th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Solomon Islands
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 488,246 constant LCU per square kilometre against 456,241 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 32,005 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Solomon Islands's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Ecuador ranks 145th and Solomon Islands ranks 144th of 165 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1980s 171,590 constant LCU per square kilometre 359,754 constant LCU per square kilometre 188,164 constant LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 209,524 constant LCU per square kilometre 341,582 constant LCU per square kilometre 132,057 constant LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 242,346 constant LCU per square kilometre 256,670 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,324 constant LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 392,676 constant LCU per square kilometre 374,558 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,117 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 426,242 constant LCU per square kilometre 439,688 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,446 constant LCU per square kilometre Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 488,246 constant LCU per square kilometre against 456,241 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Solomon Islands?
32,005 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Solomon Islands?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Solomon Islands rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 145th and Solomon Islands ranks 144th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Solomon Islands: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/solomon-islands/">Ecuador vs Solomon Islands: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.