Ecuador vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
456,241 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
361,368 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
145th
Mauritania rank
148th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 456,241 constant LCU per square kilometre against 361,368 constant LCU per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 94,873 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Mauritania's.

Across all 60 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 148th of 165 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 70,823 constant LCU per square kilometre 41,796 constant LCU per square kilometre 29,027 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 116,037 constant LCU per square kilometre 75,315 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,722 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 171,590 constant LCU per square kilometre 89,916 constant LCU per square kilometre 81,674 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 209,524 constant LCU per square kilometre 92,979 constant LCU per square kilometre 116,545 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 242,346 constant LCU per square kilometre 149,664 constant LCU per square kilometre 92,682 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 392,676 constant LCU per square kilometre 236,443 constant LCU per square kilometre 156,233 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 426,242 constant LCU per square kilometre 336,076 constant LCU per square kilometre 90,166 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Mauritania?
Ecuador, at 456,241 constant LCU per square kilometre against 361,368 constant LCU per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Mauritania?
94,873 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 145th and Mauritania ranks 148th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.