Congo vs Uruguay: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Congo
10.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
10.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
75th
Uruguay rank
76th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Uruguay
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 10.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 311,100 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Uruguay ahead.

Congo ranks 75th and Uruguay ranks 76th of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 2.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 765,626 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 2.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 597,388 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 4.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
1990s 4.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre 704,859 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 7.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2010s 13.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 9.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre 87,752 constant LCU per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Congo or Uruguay?
Congo, at 10.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 10.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Congo and Uruguay?
311,100 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uruguay?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Congo and Uruguay rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 75th and Uruguay ranks 76th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Uruguay: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/uruguay/">Congo vs Uruguay: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.