Congo vs Germany: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Congo
10.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
9.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
75th
Germany rank
78th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Germany
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 10.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 712,960 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Germany ahead.

Congo ranks 75th and Germany ranks 78th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Germany Difference Ahead
1970s 2.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.83 million constant LCU per square kilometre Germany
1980s 4.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre 709,170 constant LCU per square kilometre Germany
1990s 4.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre Germany
2000s 7.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre 468,770 constant LCU per square kilometre Germany
2010s 13.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 8.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.79 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 9.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 59,320 constant LCU per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Congo or Germany?
Congo, at 10.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 9.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Congo and Germany?
712,960 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Germany?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and Germany rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 75th and Germany ranks 78th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Germany: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/germany/">Congo vs Germany: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.