Democratic Republic of Congo vs Poland: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
6.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
7.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
86th
Poland rank
83rd

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Poland
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M199320082023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 7.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 6.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 608,050 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 86th and Poland ranks 83rd of 165 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Poland Difference Ahead
1990s 2.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 943,530 constant LCU per square kilometre Poland
2000s 2.67 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre Poland
2010s 4.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre Poland
2020s 6.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 7.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Poland?
Poland, at 7.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 6.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Poland?
608,050 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Poland?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Poland rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 86th and Poland ranks 83rd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Poland: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/poland/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Poland: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.