Chad vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Chad
6.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo
6.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
84th
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
86th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
2.0M4.0M6.0M198520042023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 6.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 6.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 155,090 constant LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Chad ranks 84th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 86th of 165 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Democratic Republic of Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Democratic Republic of Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 1.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 636,791 constant LCU per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo
2000s 3.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chad
2010s 6.17 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.65 million constant LCU per square kilometre Chad
2020s 6.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre 6.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 497,442 constant LCU per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Chad or Democratic Republic of Congo?
Chad, at 6.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 6.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
155,090 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo?
30 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Chad and Democratic Republic of Congo rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 84th and Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 86th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chad/congo-dem-rep/">Chad vs Democratic Republic of Congo: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.