Burkina Faso vs Qatar: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
39.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
44.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
50th
Qatar rank
48th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Qatar
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196519942023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 44.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 39.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 4.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 50th and Qatar ranks 48th of 165 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Qatar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Qatar Difference Ahead
1980s 7.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.90 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 9.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 15.46 million constant LCU per square kilometre 13.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 27.45 million constant LCU per square kilometre 39.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre 12.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre Qatar
2020s 34.71 million constant LCU per square kilometre 44.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9.76 million constant LCU per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Qatar?
Qatar, at 44.47 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 39.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Qatar?
4.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Qatar?
40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2020.
How do Burkina Faso and Qatar rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 50th and Qatar ranks 48th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Qatar: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/qatar/">Burkina Faso vs Qatar: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.