Argentina vs Botswana: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
284,302 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
353,770 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
153rd
Botswana rank
150th

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Botswana
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 353,770 constant LCU per square kilometre against 284,302 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 69,468 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 153rd and Botswana ranks 150th of 165 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Botswana Difference Ahead
1970s 112,058 constant LCU per square kilometre 20,724 constant LCU per square kilometre 91,335 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 116,817 constant LCU per square kilometre 35,351 constant LCU per square kilometre 81,466 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 150,353 constant LCU per square kilometre 82,876 constant LCU per square kilometre 67,477 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 181,942 constant LCU per square kilometre 132,248 constant LCU per square kilometre 49,694 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 270,900 constant LCU per square kilometre 258,636 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,264 constant LCU per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 264,126 constant LCU per square kilometre 331,558 constant LCU per square kilometre 67,432 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Botswana?
Botswana, at 353,770 constant LCU per square kilometre against 284,302 constant LCU per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Botswana?
69,468 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Botswana?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Botswana rank globally for gross national expenditure (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 153rd and Botswana ranks 150th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Botswana: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-national-expenditure-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/botswana/">Argentina vs Botswana: Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross national expenditure (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 6,569 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross national expenditure (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.