New Zealand vs Thailand: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square

New Zealand
0.1978 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
0.2174 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
78th
Thailand rank
76th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square over time

  • New Zealand
  • Thailand
00.050.10.150.2197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 0.2174 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1978 million USD per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0196 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 78th and Thailand ranks 76th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Thailand Difference Ahead
1970s 0.035 million USD per square kilometre 0.0309 million USD per square kilometre 0.0041 million USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.0474 million USD per square kilometre 0.0609 million USD per square kilometre 0.0135 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 0.0644 million USD per square kilometre 0.1566 million USD per square kilometre 0.0922 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 0.1091 million USD per square kilometre 0.1336 million USD per square kilometre 0.0245 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 0.1489 million USD per square kilometre 0.1917 million USD per square kilometre 0.0428 million USD per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 0.1941 million USD per square kilometre 0.2115 million USD per square kilometre 0.0174 million USD per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square, New Zealand or Thailand?
Thailand, at 0.2174 million USD per square kilometre against 0.1978 million USD per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square between New Zealand and Thailand?
0.0196 million USD per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Thailand?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Thailand rank globally for gross fixed capital formation — value us$, 2015 prices, per square?
New Zealand ranks 78th and Thailand ranks 76th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Thailand: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/thailand/">New Zealand vs Thailand: Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 9,641 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Gross Fixed Capital Formation — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.